- The UK Parliament on Wednesday published a cache of secret Facebook documents.
- British lawmakers seized the bombshell papers last month from Six4Three, a developer that is suing Facebook in the US.
- The documents are under seal by court order in California but were published using parliamentary privilege in the UK.
- The papers show Facebook “whitelisting” firms in return for access to data and taking “aggressive positions” against rivals, such as Twitter’s defunct video app Vine.
- The documents include emails sent by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
- Facebook said the documents formed part of a “baseless” lawsuit and were “misleading without additional context.” It added that it “never sold people’s data.”
British Parliament on Wednesday published a cache of secret Facebook documents it obtained last month from a company suing the social network.
A redacted version of the papers was pushed live on the website of the Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee, which is investigating Facebook’s privacy standards as part of an inquiry into “disinformation and fake news.”
Damian Collins, a Conservative politician who is chair of the committee, prefaced the papers with a summary of what he sees as some of the most explosive revelations. These included:
- Facebook entering “whitelisting agreements” that gave companies including Netflix and Airbnb access to friends data after Facebook introduced new privacy policies in 2014-2015.
- Collins said a recurring theme of the papers was the “idea of linking access to friends data to the financial value of the [app] developers’ relationship with Facebook.”
- They show Facebook “taking aggressive positions against apps,” Collins said. This included email evidence showing that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg personally approved a decision to deny access to data for the now-defunct Twitter video-looping app, Vine.
- Facebook made it difficult for users to know about changes it made to its Android app because they were controversial. The changes enabled Facebook to collect a record of calls and texts sent by users.
Collins obtained the documents from Ted Kramer, the founder of a software company called Six4Three, while Kramer was on business in the UK last month.
Six4Three is suing Facebook after its business – specifically, an app named Pikinis that surfaced images of people’s Facebook friends in their swimwear – was decimated when the social network tightened up its privacy policies in 2015.
A California court order had placed the documents under seal, but the Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee published them under UK parliamentary privilege, believing them to be in the public interest.
In a series of tweets, Collins made the case for publication.
“There is considerable public interest in releasing these documents,” he said. “They raise important questions about how Facebook treats users data, their policies for working with app developers, and how they exercise their dominant position in the social media market.”
He added: “We don’t feel we have had straight answers from Facebook on these important issues, which is why we are releasing the documents.”
Zuckerberg was invited to give evidence to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee on countless occasions. He declined every time, and last week, the committee – along with a group of other international lawmakers – empty-chaired Zuckerberg at a hearing. Facebook sent its policy chief, Richard Allan, instead.
A Facebook spokesman said: “As we’ve said many times, the documents Six4Three gathered for their baseless case are only part of the story and are presented in a way that is very misleading without additional context.
“We stand by the platform changes we made in 2015 to stop a person from sharing their friends’ data with developers. Like any business, we had many of internal conversations about the various ways we could build a sustainable business model for our platform.
“But the facts are clear: we’ve never sold people’s data.”
- Read more about the leaked Facebook documents:
- Facebook documents show Mark Zuckerberg presided over a list of competitors and restricted their access to data
- Internal emails show Mark Zuckerberg saying what’s good for the world is not necessarily what’s good for Facebook
- Emails show Mark Zuckerberg personally approved Facebook’s decision to cut off Vine’s access to data